Thursday, November 03, 2011

a sense forgotten.


Smell is all too often easily overlooked, as, for the most part, we prefer to surround ourselves with no odour whatsoever, or, if we are to choose an odour to fill our nostrils, it would be one of a pleasant nature, one you would want to smell over and over: a smell so delicious you want it to consume your body; every breath you take from that moment on you want to hold that same, delightful and foreign scent (for it has to be foreign or else we would get used to it and it would, therefore, cease to be a smell unnatural and noticed by our noses). 

But, as I said before, we prefer to surround ourselves with no smell at all, or, one could venture to describe it the smell of neutrality. 

For this reason it is one of the senses more easily pushed aside, ignored or, even, repressed. Think of smell. What is one of the first things to come to your mind? Decay? If not the first, it should be near the top of the list. And this is frightfully disagreeable. 

Imagine if we associated our sense of sight with dismemberment, death, horror. Or touch immediately with pain. Or sound with noise, offensive and hurtful (which would be a horrible reality as, unlike the other senses, sound is the one we cannot physically stop). 

If this were the case, we probably would repress these other senses as well. It would come naturally. Easily. The only other sense that is as easily forgotten as smell is taste. Not because it is mostly offensive, but because it is only used for a very specific purpose and at a very specific time (unless you are one of those people who go around licking everything in front of them). No, taste is usually only called upon when talking of food or drink. It is utilitarian, only used when absolutely necessary (there is another common use of taste that doesn’t involve eating or drinking, however it is linked to smell and usually, again, in a negative light, such as, “I tasted the tallow as soon as I walked into the room. Dim. I spotted three flames, burning so fierce their smell dripped onto my tongue”). Yet I will venture to say that taste is not “forgotten” the way smell is because, as stated above, smell is in use continuously and because of this our bodies find ways to overcome this continuous assault. 

I believe, however, that an unexpected smell can be one of the most jolting experiences your body can endure. What a great tool to use in the art of theatre-making? No? 

In The Rats in the Walls we experimented with smell. Out of our four performances, only once did it work the way we intended. As the play moves on and De la Poer falls prey to the alluring call of man-flesh, we decided to have a crock-pot, slowly cooking a rather pungent pork stock; the idea being that by the end of the show the room would be overwhelmed by the smell of cooking flesh and boiling bones. The smell did not waft from the back room into the playing space for the first show, so we moved it rather secretively to the back of the playing room for the second. People noticed it then (one side of the room did anyway). Our stock wasn't the same for the third and fourth shows, so the smell was nonexistent for them, which is a shame. The idea, however, remains intriguing. Smell. A sense you cannot control. A sense that brings your whole body into the show and takes your mind out of it for a moment. You better believe we'll experiment with it again.